data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/759b6/759b6cf4e0a022fde43ab4a32ee9293b1f171292" alt=""
For what it's worth, I have fit all the data here, not just the scaling law portion in the interior. I tried just fitting the same range as I'd used before to fit $r^{-\alpha}$, the fit is equally bad.
Just as an experiment, I tried fitting the amplitude separately from the argument of sinh $\rho(x)=a sinh^2(bx)$ but this fared no better, see here:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e6e8/7e6e8a4fe9d4cd9c08e8320cc727379f37d88a33" alt=""
I noticed that this new functional form qualitatively resembled what was going on in the warm data much more. I decided to try fitting hte warm data, because it might be interesting if the warm data was reaching this so-called thermodynamic limit, but the cold data was somehow being prevented from doing so. The results were disappointing I must say, here are the 1 and 2 parameter fits for the warm data:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14745/1474509bdf5a7584bdf8f47283e62966928da521" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6784b/6784b505793577bea35b768e45d0a928ff33a73f" alt=""
So, I guess it looks like none of our simulations agree with the Rybicki derivation of the eventual density profile.
No comments:
Post a Comment